Discussion in 'Boxing News and Discussion' started by mex fighter, Aug 8, 2017.
that the many pac/marquez ko was more significant than the clay/liston ko.
what say you?
In what context?
how's this...in what context would the pac/marquez ko be more significant?
I honestly can't think of one...well, maybe other than how it affected the perception of Pac's career as well as Marquez'....that's about it.
he's saying that the pac ko was more significant because pac was a better fighter than liston.
he has no idea about the fear factor, the ko power, the intimidation, how hated he was, the muslim factor, etc.
Can you link to the article?...this sounds like it was written by a younger person with no historical context.
exactomundo. hit the nail on the head.
not an article, its a meskin boxing website. the kid is like 20 years old.
Separate names with a comma.